g r o t t o 1 1

Peeve Farm
Breeding peeves for show, not just to keep as pets
Brian Tiemann
Silicon Valley-based purveyor of a confusing mixture of Apple punditry and political bile.

btman at grotto11 dot com

Read These Too:

InstaPundit
Steven Den Beste
James Lileks
Little Green Footballs
As the Apple Turns
Entropicana
Cold Fury
Capitalist Lion
Red Letter Day
Eric S. Raymond
Tal G in Jerusalem
Aziz Poonawalla
Corsair the Rational Pirate
.clue
Ravishing Light
Rosenblog
Cartago Delenda Est




Book Plugs:



Buy 'em and I get
money. I think.
BSD Mall


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More



 5/21/2007 -  5/22/2007
 5/14/2007 -  5/20/2007
  5/7/2007 -  5/13/2007
 4/30/2007 -   5/6/2007
 4/23/2007 -  4/29/2007
 4/16/2007 -  4/22/2007
  4/9/2007 -  4/15/2007
  4/2/2007 -   4/8/2007
 3/26/2007 -   4/1/2007
 3/19/2007 -  3/25/2007
 3/12/2007 -  3/18/2007
  3/5/2007 -  3/11/2007
 2/26/2007 -   3/4/2007
 2/19/2007 -  2/25/2007
 2/12/2007 -  2/18/2007
  2/5/2007 -  2/11/2007
 1/29/2007 -   2/4/2007
 1/22/2007 -  1/28/2007
 1/15/2007 -  1/21/2007
  1/8/2007 -  1/14/2007
  1/1/2007 -   1/7/2007
12/25/2006 - 12/31/2006
12/18/2006 - 12/24/2006
12/11/2006 - 12/17/2006
 12/4/2006 - 12/10/2006
11/27/2006 -  12/3/2006
11/20/2006 - 11/26/2006
11/13/2006 - 11/19/2006
 11/6/2006 - 11/12/2006
10/30/2006 -  11/5/2006
10/23/2006 - 10/29/2006
10/16/2006 - 10/22/2006
 10/9/2006 - 10/15/2006
 10/2/2006 -  10/8/2006
 9/25/2006 -  10/1/2006
 9/18/2006 -  9/24/2006
 9/11/2006 -  9/17/2006
  9/4/2006 -  9/10/2006
 8/28/2006 -   9/3/2006
 8/21/2006 -  8/27/2006
 8/14/2006 -  8/20/2006
  8/7/2006 -  8/13/2006
 7/31/2006 -   8/6/2006
 7/24/2006 -  7/30/2006
 7/17/2006 -  7/23/2006
 7/10/2006 -  7/16/2006
  7/3/2006 -   7/9/2006
 6/26/2006 -   7/2/2006
 6/19/2006 -  6/25/2006
 6/12/2006 -  6/18/2006
  6/5/2006 -  6/11/2006
 5/29/2006 -   6/4/2006
 5/22/2006 -  5/28/2006
 5/15/2006 -  5/21/2006
  5/8/2006 -  5/14/2006
  5/1/2006 -   5/7/2006
 4/24/2006 -  4/30/2006
 4/17/2006 -  4/23/2006
 4/10/2006 -  4/16/2006
  4/3/2006 -   4/9/2006
 3/27/2006 -   4/2/2006
 3/20/2006 -  3/26/2006
 3/13/2006 -  3/19/2006
  3/6/2006 -  3/12/2006
 2/27/2006 -   3/5/2006
 2/20/2006 -  2/26/2006
 2/13/2006 -  2/19/2006
  2/6/2006 -  2/12/2006
 1/30/2006 -   2/5/2006
 1/23/2006 -  1/29/2006
 1/16/2006 -  1/22/2006
  1/9/2006 -  1/15/2006
  1/2/2006 -   1/8/2006
12/26/2005 -   1/1/2005
12/19/2005 - 12/25/2005
12/12/2005 - 12/18/2005
 12/5/2005 - 12/11/2005
11/28/2005 -  12/4/2005
11/21/2005 - 11/27/2005
11/14/2005 - 11/20/2005
 11/7/2005 - 11/13/2005
10/31/2005 -  11/6/2005
10/24/2005 - 10/30/2005
10/17/2005 - 10/23/2005
10/10/2005 - 10/16/2005
 10/3/2005 -  10/9/2005
 9/26/2005 -  10/2/2005
 9/19/2005 -  9/25/2005
 9/12/2005 -  9/18/2005
  9/5/2005 -  9/11/2005
 8/29/2005 -   9/4/2005
 8/22/2005 -  8/28/2005
 8/15/2005 -  8/21/2005
  8/8/2005 -  8/14/2005
  8/1/2005 -   8/7/2005
 7/25/2005 -  7/31/2005
 7/18/2005 -  7/24/2005
 7/11/2005 -  7/17/2005
  7/4/2005 -  7/10/2005
 6/27/2005 -   7/3/2005
 6/20/2005 -  6/26/2005
 6/13/2005 -  6/19/2005
  6/6/2005 -  6/12/2005
 5/30/2005 -   6/5/2005
 5/23/2005 -  5/29/2005
 5/16/2005 -  5/22/2005
  5/9/2005 -  5/15/2005
  5/2/2005 -   5/8/2005
 4/25/2005 -   5/1/2005
 4/18/2005 -  4/24/2005
 4/11/2005 -  4/17/2005
  4/4/2005 -  4/10/2005
 3/28/2005 -   4/3/2005
 3/21/2005 -  3/27/2005
 3/14/2005 -  3/20/2005
  3/7/2005 -  3/13/2005
 2/28/2005 -   3/6/2005
 2/21/2005 -  2/27/2005
 2/14/2005 -  2/20/2005
  2/7/2005 -  2/13/2005
 1/31/2005 -   2/6/2005
 1/24/2005 -  1/30/2005
 1/17/2005 -  1/23/2005
 1/10/2005 -  1/16/2005
  1/3/2005 -   1/9/2005
12/27/2004 -   1/2/2004
12/20/2004 - 12/26/2004
12/13/2004 - 12/19/2004
 12/6/2004 - 12/12/2004
11/29/2004 -  12/5/2004
11/22/2004 - 11/28/2004
11/15/2004 - 11/21/2004
 11/8/2004 - 11/14/2004
 11/1/2004 -  11/7/2004
10/25/2004 - 10/31/2004
10/18/2004 - 10/24/2004
10/11/2004 - 10/17/2004
 10/4/2004 - 10/10/2004
 9/27/2004 -  10/3/2004
 9/20/2004 -  9/26/2004
 9/13/2004 -  9/19/2004
  9/6/2004 -  9/12/2004
 8/30/2004 -   9/5/2004
 8/23/2004 -  8/29/2004
 8/16/2004 -  8/22/2004
  8/9/2004 -  8/15/2004
  8/2/2004 -   8/8/2004
 7/26/2004 -   8/1/2004
 7/19/2004 -  7/25/2004
 7/12/2004 -  7/18/2004
  7/5/2004 -  7/11/2004
 6/28/2004 -   7/4/2004
 6/21/2004 -  6/27/2004
 6/14/2004 -  6/20/2004
  6/7/2004 -  6/13/2004
 5/31/2004 -   6/6/2004
 5/24/2004 -  5/30/2004
 5/17/2004 -  5/23/2004
 5/10/2004 -  5/16/2004
  5/3/2004 -   5/9/2004
 4/26/2004 -   5/2/2004
 4/19/2004 -  4/25/2004
 4/12/2004 -  4/18/2004
  4/5/2004 -  4/11/2004
 3/29/2004 -   4/4/2004
 3/22/2004 -  3/28/2004
 3/15/2004 -  3/21/2004
  3/8/2004 -  3/14/2004
  3/1/2004 -   3/7/2004
 2/23/2004 -  2/29/2004
 2/16/2004 -  2/22/2004
  2/9/2004 -  2/15/2004
  2/2/2004 -   2/8/2004
 1/26/2004 -   2/1/2004
 1/19/2004 -  1/25/2004
 1/12/2004 -  1/18/2004
  1/5/2004 -  1/11/2004
12/29/2003 -   1/4/2004
12/22/2003 - 12/28/2003
12/15/2003 - 12/21/2003
 12/8/2003 - 12/14/2003
 12/1/2003 -  12/7/2003
11/24/2003 - 11/30/2003
11/17/2003 - 11/23/2003
11/10/2003 - 11/16/2003
 11/3/2003 -  11/9/2003
10/27/2003 -  11/2/2003
10/20/2003 - 10/26/2003
10/13/2003 - 10/19/2003
 10/6/2003 - 10/12/2003
 9/29/2003 -  10/5/2003
 9/22/2003 -  9/28/2003
 9/15/2003 -  9/21/2003
  9/8/2003 -  9/14/2003
  9/1/2003 -   9/7/2003
 8/25/2003 -  8/31/2003
 8/18/2003 -  8/24/2003
 8/11/2003 -  8/17/2003
  8/4/2003 -  8/10/2003
 7/28/2003 -   8/3/2003
 7/21/2003 -  7/27/2003
 7/14/2003 -  7/20/2003
  7/7/2003 -  7/13/2003
 6/30/2003 -   7/6/2003
 6/23/2003 -  6/29/2003
 6/16/2003 -  6/22/2003
  6/9/2003 -  6/15/2003
  6/2/2003 -   6/8/2003
 5/26/2003 -   6/1/2003
 5/19/2003 -  5/25/2003
 5/12/2003 -  5/18/2003
  5/5/2003 -  5/11/2003
 4/28/2003 -   5/4/2003
 4/21/2003 -  4/27/2003
 4/14/2003 -  4/20/2003
  4/7/2003 -  4/13/2003
 3/31/2003 -   4/6/2003
 3/24/2003 -  3/30/2003
 3/17/2003 -  3/23/2003
 3/10/2003 -  3/16/2003
  3/3/2003 -   3/9/2003
 2/24/2003 -   3/2/2003
 2/17/2003 -  2/23/2003
 2/10/2003 -  2/16/2003
  2/3/2003 -   2/9/2003
 1/27/2003 -   2/2/2003
 1/20/2003 -  1/26/2003
 1/13/2003 -  1/19/2003
  1/6/2003 -  1/12/2003
12/30/2002 -   1/5/2003
12/23/2002 - 12/29/2002
12/16/2002 - 12/22/2002
 12/9/2002 - 12/15/2002
 12/2/2002 -  12/8/2002
11/25/2002 -  12/1/2002
11/18/2002 - 11/24/2002
11/11/2002 - 11/17/2002
 11/4/2002 - 11/10/2002
10/28/2002 -  11/3/2002
10/21/2002 - 10/27/2002
10/14/2002 - 10/20/2002
 10/7/2002 - 10/13/2002
 9/30/2002 -  10/6/2002
 9/23/2002 -  9/29/2002
 9/16/2002 -  9/22/2002
  9/9/2002 -  9/15/2002
  9/2/2002 -   9/8/2002
 8/26/2002 -   9/1/2002
 8/19/2002 -  8/25/2002
 8/12/2002 -  8/18/2002
  8/5/2002 -  8/11/2002
 7/29/2002 -   8/4/2002
 7/22/2002 -  7/28/2002
 7/15/2002 -  7/21/2002
  7/8/2002 -  7/14/2002
  7/1/2002 -   7/7/2002
 6/24/2002 -  6/30/2002
 6/17/2002 -  6/23/2002
 6/10/2002 -  6/16/2002
  6/3/2002 -   6/9/2002
 5/27/2002 -   6/2/2002
 5/20/2002 -  5/26/2002
 5/13/2002 -  5/19/2002
  5/6/2002 -  5/12/2002
 4/29/2002 -   5/5/2002
 4/22/2002 -  4/28/2002
 4/15/2002 -  4/21/2002
  4/8/2002 -  4/14/2002
  4/1/2002 -   4/7/2002
 3/25/2002 -  3/31/2002
 3/18/2002 -  3/24/2002
 3/11/2002 -  3/17/2002
  3/4/2002 -  3/10/2002
 2/25/2002 -   3/3/2002
 2/18/2002 -  2/24/2002
 2/11/2002 -  2/17/2002
  2/4/2002 -  2/10/2002
 1/28/2002 -   2/3/2002
 1/21/2002 -  1/27/2002
 1/14/2002 -  1/20/2002
  1/7/2002 -  1/13/2002
12/31/2001 -   1/6/2002
12/24/2001 - 12/30/2001
12/17/2001 - 12/23/2001
Thursday, May 17, 2007
11:01 - It was never our destiny to stop Judgment Day; it was merely to survive it

(top)

In the middle of a cornfield in the middle of Iowa, there is a data center.

Not just any data center. It's InfoBunker, probably the securest data center you're ever likely to find. It's built in a decommissioned Air Force bunker that once housed hardened military telecom equipment, as the giant radio tower that stands above the parking lot—and can be seen for miles around—attests. But that's pretty much all there is that can be seen by passersby, aside from a small entryway hut and some storage sheds and old wire spools on a patched, 60s-era parking lot. The facility extends five stories below ground, with multiple data floors, employee areas, and living quarters (the 24/7 staff doesn't see the sun very much).

Because I'd mentioned InfoBunker in my book in the latest edition, on the recommendation of my tech editor, the president of InfoBunker invited me to stop by the place as I blew through Iowa on my trek to bring home my Lotus. I turned off 80 at Des Moines and made the slight hour-or-so detour to the site on the second day.

It's not my place to go into too much detail about what's housed in the bunker, as just to get inside under escort you have to agree to a strict no-photos policy (perfectly understandable); but suffice it to say that the simplex lock on the main hut door is only the very beginning. Many hardened, keycoded, and biometric-protected doors stand between the outside world and the NOC floors, including the self-sufficient power systems (six days' worth of diesel fuel; 17,000 gallons of water, for drinking and fire suppression; military-grade NBC air filtration). It's built to withstand a 20-megaton nuclear blast at 2.5 miles, according to the website, and I can believe it. Your data will be intact even if the rest of the Internet has been vaporized.

The photos on the website are mostly mock-ups, but I can vouch that they're not far off from reality, including the ultra-swank Critical Operations Room. The conference room is even better than the mock-up, in my opinion, with custom dark wood paneling and Japanese woodblock paintings and sculptures on the walls and tables. The staff is small, but it's dedicated to perfection in presentation, and even the bathroom tile is a high-grade rough-cut stone that brings to mind a national park visitor center. Though only employees and prospective clients are ever likely to see the inside of this place, it's aimed at the kind of clients who will appreciate the kind of attention to detail that my gracious subterranean hosts obsessively display.

From what I heard, this facility is only one of a few in the country that have been sold into private hands after being decommissioned, and the only one that has been turned into a data center. The operation is humming along with the first clients who have seen the importance of this kind of hosting, but the interested client list is a mile long, and these guys seem to have a corner on this rarefied and critical market—which might turn out to be less and less rarefied as more and more data-centric organizations realize what's at stake here. The best part is that the prices are really very reasonable...

A radio tower over a military bunker in an Iowa cornfield is a pretty incongruous sight, and adding to the mix a black Lotus Esprit probably pegged the freak-o-meter for the area for a day or so. But it's all for real, and I'm happy to tell anyone who's in the market for ultra-secure data storage that these guys are the ones to go to.

Back to Top

16 comments

1. BeckoningChasm - 11:34 Fri 5/18/2007 ( email | web )

Very interesting post. I was wondering why I couldn't get to your site this morning, I guess maybe they were making sure you weren't giving away secrets...;-)

2. BillB - 11:58 Fri 5/18/2007 ( email | web )

Evidently Lotus Esprits are the new "black helicopters".

I'm calling agent Mulder.

3. Chris M - 00:40 Sat 5/19/2007 ( email )

At least 5 stories underground; in the middle of an Iowa cornfield; EMP hardened. James Lileks, your new server location awaits.

To make it absolutely perfect, the entrance should be an elevator disguised as a farmer's toolshed.

4. Brian Tiemann - 01:17 Sat 5/19/2007 ( email | web )

Or better yet: a grain elevator.

5. Chris M - 02:13 Sat 5/19/2007 ( email )

But that would be corny.... :)

6. Mumblix Grumph - 05:19 Sat 5/19/2007 ( email )

That is awesome...but I'd still rather have a decommissioned Titan I missile complex. There are three in Eastern Washington. One was for sale last year. It was a near-wreck. The Air Force took the missiles and good stuff out. They just left the silo doors open and the things rusted to near oblivion. Damn shame.

7. Planetary Gear - 06:28 Sat 5/19/2007

Is multiple-site redundancy and backup so difficult to maintain that we go back to reliance on physical security? I understand the appeal, but how would this be better than my mirroring myself in LA, NYC, London and Sydney? I could set that up from here in an hour and a few low cost hosting contracts.

Then there is the problem of what you're hosting ;) You can put as much concrete between windows and the world, but as long as that network is connected your data may as well be printed in full page ads in the NYT...

So just what kind of data is it that gets the bunker treatment? And are they relying on it as a single point of failure? Or do you suppose that these people have mirrored services in other bunkers elsewhere?

8. Wonderduck - 22:27 Sat 5/19/2007 ( email | web )

"...how would this be better than my mirroring myself in LA, NYC, London and Sydney?"

Well, for one thing, a cornfield in the middle of Iowa isn't likely to be a target for a nuclear missile. LA, NYC, London, and Sydney probably are. Not much good mirroring yourself if all the mirrors are vaporized, neh?

9. CQ - 00:14 Sun 5/20/2007 ( email )

I wonder how much data was lost when the World Trade Center went down...

That is why places like this exist, and for major businessess, are a necessity. When some Quran-besotted "martyr" drives a gas truck into another building housing a major data center, the prepared companies will, at least, have their data intact. This site exists because Al-Qaeda exists.

If I were a CIO or CSO of a large company with the budget for this, I would absolutely be a customer. I would be irresponsible not to, especially at the pricing Infobunker charges.

10. Mr. Lion - 08:22 Sun 5/20/2007 ( email | web )

Well, for one thing, a cornfield in the middle of Iowa isn't likely to be a target for a nuclear missile.


Given that it's an ex-Airforce communications site, I'd be fairly certain there's an old soviet nuke targeted directly at the place, as would be the case with the similar "silo homes" that sprang up over the last decade or so.

Putting all your eggs in one basket if your data is really that important is just silly, so far as I'm concerned. The only way to realistically protect data from the unknown is geographic separation, and then if physical security is that big a deal, well, money fixes everything.

Although, that being said, these guys are dirt bloody cheap for what they're offering. That would be more significant to me than the actual hardening of the datacenter.

11. Wonderduck - 20:33 Sun 5/20/2007 ( email | web )

Mr. Lion, I think the key word here is "ex-AirForce". If we know it's no longer an operating base, don't you think the Russians might as well?

12. Mr. Lion - 22:19 Sun 5/20/2007 ( email | web )

Oh, I'm sure they do. However, when last I checked, what was left of the Russian military isn't what I'd classify as particularly diligent. Wouldn't surprise me in the least to learn that more than a few old targets still are such, somewhere.

13. Jason McGinnis - 06:53 Mon 5/21/2007 ( email | web )

In response to everyone who mentioned nukes and prices. We list the design structure of the building, realistically I doubt many will care after a full scale exchange if their e-mail still works. It is essential however to get across the full design of the structure because its hard to put into words otherwise without the basics like that. With prices thats the point. We are a building full of network and facilities engineers and we can cut allot of the middle people out of the process and all costs associated. We are entirely self funded and have no horrifically large bank lone or VC over our shoulders trying to make a mint then sell it off as an IPO or the like. As such that allows us considerably lower operational overhead and operational freedom to do things RIGHT. We only buy carrier grade equipment ( 5 - 7 9's standard) to cut out the majority of downtime issues and management headaches, etc. We have very good first name basis with all our suppliers and get preferential deals on what we have for both services and materials. We operate best practices for power efficient devices and constantly are upgrading things like lighting and motors to help keep the power costs down. Most of our efforts for efficiency in power however are for ecological reasons, we try to be as green as a datacenter can be, no reason to not keep a few metric tons of contaminants out of the sky per day/week if we can help it, is there? (I am from Northern California... what can I say) All this being said, we pass the savings on to our clients at fair and reasonable prices. Seems reasonable to me, no?

Mumblix Grumph,
Just a comment for you... I use to own a Titan 1 complex, the one for sale in Aurora CO currently. You can see the virtual site on www.chromehooves.net , one of my current network engineers made the page and at the time was interested in the property when I had it, the site has a good history of the titans as well. You do not want to own it, you do not want to deal with the EPA compliances, you DO NOT want to deal with the asbestos, the hundreds of thousands of gallons of PCB, Lead, Arsenic, Iron Oxides, Cobalt, Manganeses, TCE, and all the other crap laden contaminated water that flood the buildings (The cobalt and Arsenic were from natural seepage from surrounding ground, not from USAF), you do not want to deal with the arguing and bickering of CHDPE and ACOE over who's at fault for what, why they haven't removed the trucks and barrels of contaminated testing material from the site, why the locks keep getting cut off the fence, who's at fault for the contaminated wells, cost of repairing dam near anything you need like stairs and ladders, reliable power to an area that floods, the fact someone broke in got hurt and tried to sue you for having an inviting nuisance even though its surrounded by a chain link fence, barb wire, marked clearly and welded shut, and you defiantly don't want to deal with the realistic cost associated with making them anywhere near close to safe for habitation. That said, they are cool and I almost regret selling it some years ago.. very Resident Evil-ish feeling. Get an Atlas E instead... they are cheaper, easier to work with and who can pass up a powered 40 ton garage door ;)

Planetary Gear,
To my knowledge we are not a primary site for any of our clients, however its not our place to ask so I can not be 100% sure of that statement for you. We search all hardware for anything hazardous coming in the building but that doesn't cover asking why that piece of equipment is being used and what for. Best practices say that all data heavy operations should have a minimum of one redundant recovery solution 60 miles away from the primary. We of course, aim to be that redundant location to top all other locations. I of course can not say WHO our clients are, an NDA is standard in our contracts unless they sign it away. I can say likely clients of our services would be financial, insurance, medical, goverment... So this generic statement is basically saying all industries that would want a central location that can be resilient for data that has to be stored and accessed 24x7 for compliance reasons and ones that need to meet and exceed physical security standards for HIPPA, Sarbanes Oxley, things like that. Our prices however open us op to a much broader market though and we are seeing even small ISP's and mom and pop shops sending back-end things like their CC box for online purchasing and the like. AND for the record we are purchasing more sited to be built out in a few more states in case you were wondering, more to follow on that on the site in a year or so.

Feel free to e-mail if you have any questions or comments.
Jason McGinnis
President
InfoBunker

P.S. Brian, feel free to come back any time it was a blast having you out. We still have unfinished business to attend to and I think that beaver.. thing.. under the bridge might pop back up for another photo op.

14. Bruce McFadden - 10:16 Mon 5/21/2007 ( email )

I understand this bunker provides a way for your data HOW to survive a 20 megaton nuclear explosion, but my only question is WHY -- what world would be left of value for your data to inhabit? I think we should spend less time planning on surviving nuclear attack, and more effort thinking of ways to eliminate the possibility of it ever happening in the first place.

15. PaleBlueDot - 12:13 Mon 5/21/2007 ( email )

I got to visit a similar facility in NW Pennsylvania about a year back. Not quite as secure as InfoBunker, but definitely just as cool. Iron Mountain has a bunker which caters to lots of government/private/international clients for archiving and storage; i dont think its setup for networking and data, but they definitely have lots of space for archiving documents/photographs/films, etc. There are a lot of one-of-a-kinds and first editions located there and while its not quite nuclear attack hardened, security to get in/out is very high.

16. Wonderduck - 21:36 Mon 5/21/2007 ( email | web )

"I think we should spend less time planning on surviving nuclear attack, and more effort thinking of ways to eliminate the possibility of it ever happening in the first place."

There's a very old saying, Mr. McFadden: 'If you desire peace, prepare for war.' Nobody wants a war, but the possibility will ALWAYS be there... does that mean you should just give up, roll over and die? Or would you consider preparing for it?

That's all some place like this is... planning for the worst case scenario. As far as 'what world would be left', let's say nukes go off in Chicago, NYC, LA, and Miami... that leaves an awful lot of the US relatively unscathed, and I suspect that there'd be people wanting their data back, no?

Now, if there was a full-scale, everybody unloads, kaboom-style war, yes, you're quite right. It's also possible that tomorrow the Earth will go spinning into the sun, in which case the data will be worthless, too. These backups aren't for the worst-case kaboom... they're for everything up to that level, I'd reckon.


© Brian Tiemann