g r o t t o 1 1

Peeve Farm
Breeding peeves for show, not just to keep as pets
  Blog \Blôg\, n. [Jrg, fr. Jrg. "Web-log".
     See {Blogger, BlogSpot, LiveJournal}.]
     A stream-of-consciousness Web journal, containing
     links, commentary, and pointless drivel.


On My Blog Menu:

InstaPundit
USS Clueless
James Lileks
Little Green Footballs
As the Apple Turns
Entropicana
Cold Fury
Capitalist Lion
Red Letter Day
Eric S. Raymond
Tal G in Jerusalem
Secular Islam
Aziz Poonawalla
Corsair the Rational Pirate
.clue

« ? Blogging Brians # »





Book Plug:

Buy it and I get
money. I think.
BSD Mall




 10/6/2003 -  10/8/2003
 9/29/2003 -  10/5/2003
 9/22/2003 -  9/28/2003
 9/15/2003 -  9/21/2003
  9/8/2003 -  9/14/2003
  9/1/2003 -   9/7/2003
 8/25/2003 -  8/31/2003
 8/18/2003 -  8/24/2003
 8/11/2003 -  8/17/2003
  8/4/2003 -  8/10/2003
 7/28/2003 -   8/3/2003
 7/21/2003 -  7/27/2003
 7/14/2003 -  7/20/2003
  7/7/2003 -  7/13/2003
 6/30/2003 -   7/6/2003
 6/23/2003 -  6/29/2003
 6/16/2003 -  6/22/2003
  6/9/2003 -  6/15/2003
  6/2/2003 -   6/8/2003
 5/26/2003 -   6/1/2003
 5/19/2003 -  5/25/2003
 5/12/2003 -  5/18/2003
  5/5/2003 -  5/11/2003
 4/28/2003 -   5/4/2003
 4/21/2003 -  4/27/2003
 4/14/2003 -  4/20/2003
  4/7/2003 -  4/13/2003
 3/31/2003 -   4/6/2003
 3/24/2003 -  3/30/2003
 3/17/2003 -  3/23/2003
 3/10/2003 -  3/16/2003
  3/3/2003 -   3/9/2003
 2/24/2003 -   3/2/2003
 2/17/2003 -  2/23/2003
 2/10/2003 -  2/16/2003
  2/3/2003 -   2/9/2003
 1/27/2003 -   2/2/2003
 1/20/2003 -  1/26/2003
 1/13/2003 -  1/19/2003
  1/6/2003 -  1/12/2003
12/30/2002 -   1/5/2003
12/23/2002 - 12/29/2002
12/16/2002 - 12/22/2002
 12/9/2002 - 12/15/2002
 12/2/2002 -  12/8/2002
11/25/2002 -  12/1/2002
11/18/2002 - 11/24/2002
11/11/2002 - 11/17/2002
 11/4/2002 - 11/10/2002
10/28/2002 -  11/3/2002
10/21/2002 - 10/27/2002
10/14/2002 - 10/20/2002
 10/7/2002 - 10/13/2002
 9/30/2002 -  10/6/2002
 9/23/2002 -  9/29/2002
 9/16/2002 -  9/22/2002
  9/9/2002 -  9/15/2002
  9/2/2002 -   9/8/2002
 8/26/2002 -   9/1/2002
 8/19/2002 -  8/25/2002
 8/12/2002 -  8/18/2002
  8/5/2002 -  8/11/2002
 7/29/2002 -   8/4/2002
 7/22/2002 -  7/28/2002
 7/15/2002 -  7/21/2002
  7/8/2002 -  7/14/2002
  7/1/2002 -   7/7/2002
 6/24/2002 -  6/30/2002
 6/17/2002 -  6/23/2002
 6/10/2002 -  6/16/2002
  6/3/2002 -   6/9/2002
 5/27/2002 -   6/2/2002
 5/20/2002 -  5/26/2002
 5/13/2002 -  5/19/2002
  5/6/2002 -  5/12/2002
 4/29/2002 -   5/5/2002
 4/22/2002 -  4/28/2002
 4/15/2002 -  4/21/2002
  4/8/2002 -  4/14/2002
  4/1/2002 -   4/7/2002
 3/25/2002 -  3/31/2002
 3/18/2002 -  3/24/2002
 3/11/2002 -  3/17/2002
  3/4/2002 -  3/10/2002
 2/25/2002 -   3/3/2002
 2/18/2002 -  2/24/2002
 2/11/2002 -  2/17/2002
  2/4/2002 -  2/10/2002
 1/28/2002 -   2/3/2002
 1/21/2002 -  1/27/2002
 1/14/2002 -  1/20/2002
  1/7/2002 -  1/13/2002
12/31/2001 -   1/6/2002
12/24/2001 - 12/30/2001
12/17/2001 - 12/23/2001
Friday, April 25, 2003
16:35 - Where Have You Gone, Paul Tatara?
http://www.flakmag.com/features/tatara.html

(top) link
Just today, it suddenly dawned on me out of the blue that I hadn't seen any movie reviews by Paul Tatara in almost a year. Tatara, I've mentioned once or twice before (though not at all lately), is one of two movie critics at CNN.com (the other being the pedestrian and downright boring Paul Clinton).

Or was, more appropriately. It turns out that Tatara, whose reviews were always immensely fun, academic, well-informed, highly discriminating, conversational, dynamic, and often uproariously funny, is no longer working for CNN-- and hasn't been since mid-2002, after what was ostensibly a contract dispute. And now, when I go to CNN's movie-reviews site, I find that not only isn't Paul Clinton filling the rolls with his fourth-grade-book-report drudgery, but nobody really is-- that is, nobody with a name. CNN only links to movie reviews by their titles, now, rather than by the name of the reviewer. And apparently that was the point.

From 1997 to 2001, Tatara appeared frequently, as often as 16 times a month, along with the critic who actually appeared on TV, Paul Clinton. In 2002, his workload suddenly dropped to, at most, five reviews a month. There were times in the past that CNN.com editors had told Tatara that the higher-ups weren't loving his work, and more and more the site was relying on Entertainment Weekly, its sister AOL Time Warner publication.

"There were always periods, after nine months or so, when someone would raise a stink about the tone of writing being too conversational, too harsh, too, too, too," says Tatara, who is not speaking in exclamation points at this moment. He's just warming up.

"Especially with the conversational tone. They wanted me to be faceless!"

"It could be that [CNN's] blood pressure was higher, because the site wasn't making money! I had a real readership, but they couldn't care less! They weren't allowing people any real personality! At this point, [CNN] is like the Kmart of news services, and instead of a news flash, they should have a Blue Light Special!"

And that's not all. Apparently the final straw was Tatara's December 2001 review of Black Hawk Down, which, admittedly, I allowed to inform my presuppositions of the movie when I bitched about it last year. (In my defense, it was Super Bowl day, and I was in no mood to be given a good impression by anything.) Since then, I've been set straight by friends and co-conspirators who shared Ollie North's opinion that the widespread panning of the movie by Tatara and others as a clumsy, nuance-free splatterfest was grossly unfair-- that the movie was actually astonishingly accurate to real life, and the jarring nature of its graphic scenes and the perceived bestial brutality of the Somali mobs was not exaggerated out of any appeal to bloodthirsty racism. Rather, the movie was just too honest for most of today's sophisticates to accept without a layer of wry Apocalypse Now wit and commentary and mythic storytelling. Real life doesn't play like a movie script-- and because BHD doesn't seem to have much of what's traditionally thought of as a well-constructed, sophisticated plot just means it's true to real life instead of to Hollywood expectations.

Anyway, so evidently CNN didn't like Tatara's review of BHD; and over the next several months they phased him out in favor of less-controversial writers. (I always thought there had to be some story behind the disclaimer/footers he attached to so many of his reviews: Warner Bros. is an AOL Time Warner sister company of CNN.com. Probably not put there voluntarily, eh, Paul?) CNN now has its wish: a parade of anonymous movie reviewers from AP and other random sources, filling billets without injecting any of that unwanted personality. Paul's last review, Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, was on June 7. After that, he resigned and returned to his first love: screenwriting.

Which means he won't be doing any more reviewing, though he's apparently looking for review work. All his old reviews are still online at the Paul Tatara Movie Review Archive, which has the text of his resignation letter, as well as the assurance that the man's reviews were loved by a great many people, something I had suspected but not known for sure. I'd become a disciple of his work totally on my own; there's nothing like discovering that what you'd thought was a personal treasured secret is actually the basis of Internet fan sites.

Maybe Paul should blog his reviews. Yeah, he wouldn't be getting paid for them; but if he enjoys doing it, hey, it should be pretty obvious that there are lots of people out here who will write tons of drivel every day for no tangible profit and at the expense of our day jobs and social lives. C'mon, Paul-- you've still got fans out here. And there's movie after movie going un-reviewed-by-you. This cannot be allowed to stand.

Geez... that was about the easiest piece of online research I've ever had to do. URLs practically hurled themselves at me.


Back to Top


© Brian Tiemann