Thursday, October 24, 2002 |
11:20 - I used to be with it...
|
(top) |
"...But then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me!"
Remember a few years ago, how it seemed that the bright new future of the Internet would involve seamless heterogeneity-- every computing platform would have roughly the same functionality and could interoperate natively on open standards? No matter what your OS of choice, you could plug the machine into the wall in your dorm room or cubicle and it would "just work"?
Well, technologically that's happened. But sociologically, we're moving backwards. And you can thank the hackers for that.
UC Santa Barbara, for instance, has recently instituted a new policy whereby Windows 2000 and NT are banned from the student ResNet. (A peek at the site reveals that they've already taken a lot of heat for this, and they've gamely explained the reasoning behind it as stemming from the fact that nobody administers the network but the students themselves, most of whom are no better equipped or prepared to de-Code-Red-ify and de-Nimda-ify their computers than the average home users is. Though this won't help much when the next such attack, to which XP is vulnerable, rolls around.)
Quoting Jeremy Epstein, from the RISKS digest where this was brought up:
BTW, students have to pay for a copy of WinXP. Maybe this is a fundraising effort by Microsoft... put out products that are so vulnerable that users have to spend more money to buy a less vulnerable version. "I'm sorry ma'am, but the wheels frequently fall off the 1998 model cars. We have no intention of fixing the problem. Would you like to buy a 2002 model for $20,000? By the way, you'll also need to build a new garage on your house to park it in, and a new driver's license, because the old ones aren't compatible."
So, nothing but XP for UCSB students. And meanwhile, many companies-- including my own, and Cisco (whose network was brought to a standstill by the networking stuff in XP during a beta), still prohibit XP within the corporate network. Anything but XP for such people.
And to add another bubble to the Venn diagram of platforms whose interoperability overlaps are rapidly retreating from each other like grease spots when you dump in the detergent, King's College of London University has banned UNIX and Linux from their network. In the interest of security and "network integrity".
> You may not run any Unix operating system since they can represent a serious > risk to network integrity. Any student found running a Unix system (e.g. > Linux) connected to the College network will have that system disconnected.
Because, see, all hackers use Linux; everybody knows that. Windows users, however, are to the last man pure as the driven snow. And all viruses and Trojans are really spread by UNIX. Never did trust them UNIX blokes, me. No balls at all.
(I suppose it goes without saying that Macs are banned too, because they're UNIX. Can't have them screwing up KCL's perfect and pure network integrity.)
Hybrid vigor, they called it. Free-enterprise competition. Survival of the fittest. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. The "mutts" live the longest.
Whatever became of that grand vision?
|
|