g r o t t o 1 1

Peeve Farm
Breeding peeves for show, not just to keep as pets
Brian Tiemann
Silicon Valley-based purveyor of a confusing mixture of Apple punditry and political bile.

btman at grotto11 dot com

On My Blog Menu:

InstaPundit
USS Clueless
James Lileks
Little Green Footballs
As the Apple Turns
Entropicana
Cold Fury
Capitalist Lion
Red Letter Day
Eric S. Raymond
Tal G in Jerusalem
Secular Islam
Aziz Poonawalla
Corsair the Rational Pirate
.clue

« ? Blogging Brians # »





Book Plugs:


Buy 'em and I get
money. I think.
BSD Mall




 5/10/2004 -  5/10/2004
  5/3/2004 -   5/9/2004
 4/26/2004 -   5/2/2004
 4/19/2004 -  4/25/2004
 4/12/2004 -  4/18/2004
  4/5/2004 -  4/11/2004
 3/29/2004 -   4/4/2004
 3/22/2004 -  3/28/2004
 3/15/2004 -  3/21/2004
  3/8/2004 -  3/14/2004
  3/1/2004 -   3/7/2004
 2/23/2004 -  2/29/2004
 2/16/2004 -  2/22/2004
  2/9/2004 -  2/15/2004
  2/2/2004 -   2/8/2004
 1/26/2004 -   2/1/2004
 1/19/2004 -  1/25/2004
 1/12/2004 -  1/18/2004
  1/5/2004 -  1/11/2004
12/29/2003 -   1/4/2004
12/22/2003 - 12/28/2003
12/15/2003 - 12/21/2003
 12/8/2003 - 12/14/2003
 12/1/2003 -  12/7/2003
11/24/2003 - 11/30/2003
11/17/2003 - 11/23/2003
11/10/2003 - 11/16/2003
 11/3/2003 -  11/9/2003
10/27/2003 -  11/2/2003
10/20/2003 - 10/26/2003
10/13/2003 - 10/19/2003
 10/6/2003 - 10/12/2003
 9/29/2003 -  10/5/2003
 9/22/2003 -  9/28/2003
 9/15/2003 -  9/21/2003
  9/8/2003 -  9/14/2003
  9/1/2003 -   9/7/2003
 8/25/2003 -  8/31/2003
 8/18/2003 -  8/24/2003
 8/11/2003 -  8/17/2003
  8/4/2003 -  8/10/2003
 7/28/2003 -   8/3/2003
 7/21/2003 -  7/27/2003
 7/14/2003 -  7/20/2003
  7/7/2003 -  7/13/2003
 6/30/2003 -   7/6/2003
 6/23/2003 -  6/29/2003
 6/16/2003 -  6/22/2003
  6/9/2003 -  6/15/2003
  6/2/2003 -   6/8/2003
 5/26/2003 -   6/1/2003
 5/19/2003 -  5/25/2003
 5/12/2003 -  5/18/2003
  5/5/2003 -  5/11/2003
 4/28/2003 -   5/4/2003
 4/21/2003 -  4/27/2003
 4/14/2003 -  4/20/2003
  4/7/2003 -  4/13/2003
 3/31/2003 -   4/6/2003
 3/24/2003 -  3/30/2003
 3/17/2003 -  3/23/2003
 3/10/2003 -  3/16/2003
  3/3/2003 -   3/9/2003
 2/24/2003 -   3/2/2003
 2/17/2003 -  2/23/2003
 2/10/2003 -  2/16/2003
  2/3/2003 -   2/9/2003
 1/27/2003 -   2/2/2003
 1/20/2003 -  1/26/2003
 1/13/2003 -  1/19/2003
  1/6/2003 -  1/12/2003
12/30/2002 -   1/5/2003
12/23/2002 - 12/29/2002
12/16/2002 - 12/22/2002
 12/9/2002 - 12/15/2002
 12/2/2002 -  12/8/2002
11/25/2002 -  12/1/2002
11/18/2002 - 11/24/2002
11/11/2002 - 11/17/2002
 11/4/2002 - 11/10/2002
10/28/2002 -  11/3/2002
10/21/2002 - 10/27/2002
10/14/2002 - 10/20/2002
 10/7/2002 - 10/13/2002
 9/30/2002 -  10/6/2002
 9/23/2002 -  9/29/2002
 9/16/2002 -  9/22/2002
  9/9/2002 -  9/15/2002
  9/2/2002 -   9/8/2002
 8/26/2002 -   9/1/2002
 8/19/2002 -  8/25/2002
 8/12/2002 -  8/18/2002
  8/5/2002 -  8/11/2002
 7/29/2002 -   8/4/2002
 7/22/2002 -  7/28/2002
 7/15/2002 -  7/21/2002
  7/8/2002 -  7/14/2002
  7/1/2002 -   7/7/2002
 6/24/2002 -  6/30/2002
 6/17/2002 -  6/23/2002
 6/10/2002 -  6/16/2002
  6/3/2002 -   6/9/2002
 5/27/2002 -   6/2/2002
 5/20/2002 -  5/26/2002
 5/13/2002 -  5/19/2002
  5/6/2002 -  5/12/2002
 4/29/2002 -   5/5/2002
 4/22/2002 -  4/28/2002
 4/15/2002 -  4/21/2002
  4/8/2002 -  4/14/2002
  4/1/2002 -   4/7/2002
 3/25/2002 -  3/31/2002
 3/18/2002 -  3/24/2002
 3/11/2002 -  3/17/2002
  3/4/2002 -  3/10/2002
 2/25/2002 -   3/3/2002
 2/18/2002 -  2/24/2002
 2/11/2002 -  2/17/2002
  2/4/2002 -  2/10/2002
 1/28/2002 -   2/3/2002
 1/21/2002 -  1/27/2002
 1/14/2002 -  1/20/2002
  1/7/2002 -  1/13/2002
12/31/2001 -   1/6/2002
12/24/2001 - 12/30/2001
12/17/2001 - 12/23/2001
Monday, May 10, 2004
12:44 - The credibility standard

(top) link
See, this is the problem with being America. We can either choose to be as flawed as all other countries have been in history, following all the same tired old scripts that governments keep reading from today; or we can stick to our grand experiment, and face an entirely unique kind of criticism.

In the post-Cold-War era, it's difficult for people to criticize the American system. We've clearly won; we're the superpower, and we've somehow managed to become so without any imperial armies bestriding the globe or gulags full of political prisoners. By any standard of history, we've come up with the system that works—it makes us all wildly rich and unprecedentedly free and insanely happy, and our biggest problems come from our interfaces with other countries that aren't anywhere near as much of any of these.

So if people can't criticize us for being inferior or for our experiment failing, they try a different tactic. They say, "Okay, wise guy. If you're so perfect, how come you're not perfect?"

Because we're not perfect. Duh. Nothing is perfect. Our system survives and thrives because it is fault-tolerant—because it has mechanisms for minimizing the impact of failures of the system. People can try to take advantage of the freedoms and benefits of our system, but the system itself has methods of dealing with those kinds of attacks against it that are internally consistent. We don't execute "political dissidents", for example; rather, we find the term wholly alien, and instead simply allow all voices to speak as loudly as they can, putting our faith in the majority to make sensible decisions. It's a leap of faith to allow such a thing to happen, but it's paid off. We've learned that if we don't try to micromanage our economy or our political landscape, and instead trust the system to take care of itself, by golly, it does. Imagine that.

But the failures of parts of the system, while we see them as opportunities to observe the system in action taking care of them, appear to the rest of the world as proof that our system itself is flawed after all. We look at the Abu Ghraib incident with revulsion; every American with a sense of decency is shocked and appalled, and the President has had to go on foreign television apologizing for the actions of our own soldiers.

To us, this is not just horrifying—it's also vaguely thrilling, because it proves the basic decency of Americans, including the President we elected. We don't try to deny Abu Ghraib ever happened; on the contrary, once it became clear that it was a big deal, we use it as a demonstration of how the rest of us react to such an atrocity. When Bush says Americans won't stand for it, he means it; and he's telling the truth.

But to the rest of the world, it's not our reaction that's important—in fact, our reaction, and Bush's, are to be derided and ignored. What's really important, what's really indicative of how America operates, is the aberration itself.

So when this happens (via Tim Blair:

Fallujah native Abdul-Qader Abdul-Rahman al-Ani, his left elbow wrapped in bandages, his right forearm bound in a cast, recounted how he was beaten by soldiers who picked him up last month. The soldiers tied him and two others arrested with him to a tree and sodomized them one after the other, he told journalists.

"I ask President Bush," he said. "Does he agree with this?"

As Ani, 47, repeated his story, he was interrupted by Jabber al-Okaili, a member of one of the human rights groups that organized the gathering. "He's lying," al-Okaili shouted. "He's a liar!"

Al-Ani was rushed to an office, where al-Okaili and others unwound the bandage on his left arm and found the elbow unscarred and healthy. They cut off half of the cast on his forearm, even as al-Ani insisted, "By God, it's true, everything I say is true."

... foreign news stations pick up on the detainee's claims, and don't mention the takedown. Tim's update:

SBS television just showed German news footage of Ani making his disputed claim -- and that's all. No mention of anybody calling him a liar.

Where else do you suppose we'll be seeing mountains of reports of abuse of Iraqis by American soldiers—all trumped-up, all faked, but none debunked? My money's on "everywhere".

Because the credibility of the plaintiffs in this case is worlds higher than the credibility of America. Everybody wants to believe the Iraqis, especially when they're lashing out at the Great Satan; nobody wants to believe the Great Satan itself.

Our system deals well with cases where our own citizens try to game the system. What we're not so good at, though, is dealing with cases where people in other countries—where they don't play by our rules—game our system. Our weak spots are much weaker outside our borders; and our strong spots are also far less strong. When we try to treat the rest of the world as though it's America, it doesn't play along; rather, it sees us as a pathetically vulnerable target to its own tactics.

Nobody can believe that our military is actually as good as it is. It just doesn't compute. So people naturally believe the stories of complainants of "abuse" and "torture", especially if there's a documented case to point to—one that makes headlines where the rest of the military's exemplary behavior never does. Nobody can believe that morale is as high as it is in our military, or that re-enlistement and recruitment rates are so high that the Army and the Marines are having to turn down applicants; so people naturally believe dark rumors that we're thinking of instituting the draft to prop up our failing ranks. Nobody can believe that the rebuilding of Iraq has gone as well as it has in 95% of the country; so people naturally believe tales of a war-torn wasteland straight out of Mad Max, given credence by a few photos of corpses hanging from a bridge in Fallujah.

Is our experience in this country really that different from how the rest of the world works? I grew up being soothingly told that everybody's the same all the world over; but only time and experience are beginning to shatter that pleasing illusion.

According to all the lessons of history, says the rest of the world, America shouldn't work—it's a statistical outlier, it shouldn't last, it shouldn't exist.

It's funny how seldom America itself seems to be allowed to teach a "lesson of history", though, isn't it?


Back to Top


© Brian Tiemann