Tuesday, September 24, 2002 |
00:28 - Additions to the Lilexicon
http://www.lileks.com/bleats/archive/02/0902/090402.html#092502
|
(top) |
This paragraph, regarding the Gore speech, is gold:
It’s been pulled apart by wolves all over blogland today, so I’ll leave it alone. Substance aside, the speech made me glad I don’t have to listen to this man very much; he manages to combine pretentiousness and contempt in a way that demands a new word - pretemptuous, perhaps. Or goratory. He’s a better extemporaneous speaker than Bush, but that’s not exactly a rare distinction. Bush often seems distracted, as if he has just realized there is a weasel in his pants and he’d best finish up and get out of here so he can tend to this here weasel. And when he gets wound up he’s often like a man with a wheelbarrow full of rocks going down a hill, trying to keep his balance and his cargo intact. I don’t care. He’s good with a prepared speech, because he has a secret weapon: he means it.
And he goes on, and it's all bullion of one sort or another.
One doesn't have to think, by the way, that Bush is a first-class extemporaneous speaker or possessed of unusual academic intelligence to have a respect for how he's stuck to a set of ideals that one can forget are important in the moral fog brought on by our being a rich and ease-loving people.
I didn't vote for him, but I certainly wish I had-- because now we know what we'd be doing today if Gore had carried the day in November 2000.
Probably be picking up after something bigger and badder than 9/11, just on a hunch.
|
|